ᠮᠤᠩᠭᠤᠯ ᠪᠢᠴᠢᠭ ᠰᠢᠨ᠎ᠡ ᠪᠠᠷ ᠺᠤᠳᠡᠯᠠᠬᠤ ᠡᠷᠭᠦᠳᠡᠯ

The Usgiin Solution, proposed by Z team pg. 1 ᠠᠡᡷᠿᡃ ᠧᠡᡩᠡᡒᠡᠡ ᠮ ᠧᠧᠡᢉ ᠠᠪᠧᡙᠪᡉ Proposed by Z team Advised and tested by 23 professors and experts Requested by 10,000 Mongolian Script Users with Signatures Монгол үсгийн шийдэл The Mongolian Usgiin Solution 蒙古文 字体解决方案 Doc Type: Working Group Document Title: Preliminary proposal for encoding the Mongolian Usgiin Solution in the SMP of the UCS Source: Z Team, Chuck Namujila/Erhem Status: Private entity contribution Action: For consideration by JTC1/SC2/WG2 and UTC Date: 2020-01-28 Version 0.2 Confidentiality: Please do not further disclose ᠵᠫᡒᡂᠡᠨᠢ ᡥᠡᠨ ᡊᠪᡷᠨ ᡅᠫᠧᡩᠪ ᡒᠪᡅ᠊ᠡᠢ ᠧᠧᠡᠣ ᠵ᠊ᠧᡭᠧᡉ ᡊᠪᠡᡇᡂᠪ ᡖ The Usgiin Solution, proposed by Z team pg. 2 ᡀᠡᢉ ᠪᠣ ᠠᠪᠧᡙᠪᡉ Document sign-off 文件签字表 ᡥᠪᠧᡙᠪ ᡖ ᠪ ᠣ ᠵᠫᠧᡷᠧ ᡒᡩᠪ ᡅᠫᠣ Role 职 务 Solut ion Arc hite ct B.1-Specialized (small collection); B.2-Specialized (large collection); C-Major extinct; D-Attested extinct; E-Minor extinct; F-Archaic Hieroglyphic or Ideographic; G-Obscure or questionable usage symbols) Category A 4a. Is a repertoire including character names provided? Yes. 4b. If YES, are the names in accordance with the “character naming guidelines” in Annex L of P common or rare) Common. 4b. Reference 5a. Are the proposed characters in current use by the user community? Yes. 5b. If YES, where? Scholars and some local use in Guinea and Liberia. To be updated. 6a. After giving due considerations to the principles in the P&P document must the proposed characters be entirely in the BMP? No. 6b. If YES, is a rationale provided? 6c. If YES, reference 7. Should the proposed characters be kept together in a contiguous range (rather than being scattered)? Yes. 8a. Can any of the proposed characters be considered a presentation form of an existing character or character sequence? No. this is a fresh new Usgiin solution. The Usgiin Solution, proposed by Z team pg. 26 8b. If YES, is a rationale for its inclusion provided? 8c. If YES, reference 9a. Can any of the proposed characters be encoded using a composed character sequence of either existing characters or other proposed characters? No. 9b. If YES, is a rationale for its inclusion provided? 9c. If YES, reference 10a. Can any of the proposed character(s) be considered to be similar (in appearance or function) to an existing character? No. This is a fresh new solution. 10b. If YES, is a rationale for its inclusion provided? 10c. If YES, reference 11a. Does the proposal include use of combining characters and/or use of composite sequences (see clauses 4.12 and 4.14 in ISO/IEC 10646-1: 2000)? No. 11b. If YES, is a rationale for such use provided? 11c. If YES, reference 11d. Is a list of composite sequences and their corresponding glyph images (graphic symbols) provided? No. 11e. If YES, reference 12a. Does the proposal contain characters with any special properties such as control function or similar semantics? No. 12b. If YES, describe in detail (include attachment if necessary) 13a. Does the proposal contain any Ideographic compatibility character(s)? No. 13b. If YES, is the equivalent corresponding unified ideographic character(s) identified? No.